CLEAR

  • CLEAR Website
  • CLEAR News Home
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Calendar of Events

Search

| More

Calendar

  • CLEAR and member events

Categories

  • Agency reports
  • Books
  • CLEAR Announcements
  • CLEAR Resources
  • Court Cases
  • Current Affairs
  • ERAC Q&A Series
  • Legislative Audits
  • Performance and legislative audits
  • President's Message
  • Regulation by Country
  • Reports on Professions
  • Sponsors
  • Sunrise reviews
  • Sunset reviews
  • Upcoming Events

Previous Issues

  • CLEAR News

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012

ERAC Q&A series: What is validity and why is it important?

Credentialing organizations are expected to provide evidence of “reliability and validity” for any tests or assessment used in the credentialing process.  Validity is considered of paramount importance—but what is it?

The concept of validity has been a topic of hot debate among psychometricians in terms of how it should be defined, conceptualized, communicated, and used.  These issues bring a sparkle to the eyes of many psychometricians, but the eyes of others tend to glaze over as the discussion ensues.  Fortunately, one does not need a psychometrician’s level of expertise in order to embrace the basic concept of validity.  Validity has to do with whether a test serves its intended purpose effectively.

Read more

August 07, 2008 in ERAC Q&A Series | Permalink

ERAC Q&A series: What is reliability and why is it important?

Requests for proposals for testing services often reference the desire that the sponsoring organization will have a “reliable and valid test.”  From a measurement perspective, this request cannot be met because reliability as a concept is somewhat different from the popular perspective. Reliability refers to the level of precision or consistency of test scores, not the test itself. As an example, the reliability of scores would likely be different if calculated on two groups of examinees who have a different range of ability.
Read more.

July 03, 2008 in ERAC Q&A Series | Permalink

ERAC Q&A series: What is equating and why is it used?

Even when examination forms are carefully designed to be equivalent, some variation in difficulty between forms is likely.  Variations in difficulty become especially problematic when the purpose of the examination is to determine whether someone is sufficiently competent to practice a profession or obtain a credential.  It is inherently unfair for some candidates to be given harder examinations while others are given easier examinations unless these differences are taken into account.  Equating addresses these differences by determining the equivalent passing score on multiple examination forms.  Equating is often used in conjunction with scaling but these are actually two different processes.  When used together, the equating is performed first followed by the scaling.
Read more.

February 22, 2008 in ERAC Q&A Series | Permalink

ERAC Q&A series: What is scaling and why is it used?

No matter how accurately examination forms are assembled to reflect a specific degree of difficulty, there is always some variability.  The goal is to make certain that subsequent forms have the same degree of difficulty as the original form, but this is not always possible.  For that reason, a standard scale for reporting results is used.  Suppose one candidate takes a relatively easy examination and receives a raw score of 82.  During another administration, a candidate takes a relatively difficult version of the same examination and receives a raw score of 77.  Is the first candidate more competent than the second? Read more.

June 11, 2007 in ERAC Q&A Series | Permalink

Recent Posts

  • Changes proposed to Libyan health system
  • Florida: website to verify contractor's license
  • Indiana: licensing bills vetoed
  • New Jersey: best practices for pharmacy security
  • Nevada medical marijuana legislation introduced; calls for regulation of 65 dispensaries
  • Study rates American states by "occupational licensing freedom"
  • Canadian Society calls for regulation of medical laboratory assistants
  • Delaware AG proposes prescription drug legislation: limiting doses; increasing penalties for diversion
  • Oregon House approves "natural hair care bill," providing exemption from state barbering requirements
  • Professional Beauty Association launches campaign against deregulation: "I am a professional, I am licensed."

Contact

  • E-mail CLEAR
Blog powered by TypePad